K. Stephenson examines how heterarchies that bring together elements of networks and hierarchies are the most relevant organizational structures for our times.
The term is best defined by its double opposition: to hierarchy on the one hand (both top-down and bottom-up approaches can be hierarchical), and to peer-to-peer-networks (because in the messy realities of human society, creating order and structuring decision making through mere peer-to-peer communication/coordination is an illusion).
If hierarchy is the power system of centralized systems, then heterarchical power is the power system of decentralized systems and Responsible Autonomy is the power system of distributed systems. wiki
One can think about heterarchies as reconciling networks and hiearchies, html 
. It brings together together top-down, bottom-up, and peer-to-peer dynamics.
# Features
The problem with heterarchy, and the challenge to making it work, is not the lack of hierarchy, but too many competing hierarchies. And that's the reality we live in. Ogilvy
- recognizes, that we cannot get rid of all kind of hierarchies or levels, for instance: There are different levels of decision making
Communities and societies are bounded systems with relational structures. If A does something, there is to be expected an effect on B or C.
"internectively too rich to submit to a summum bonum."
POST http://image-transporter.apps.allmende.io/image
# See also
add related concepts
# Sources